v Salisbury build up and match thread

[Manic Loop]

right then..... retribution time

[BKW182]

They're gonna come to the city ground, their gunna have the full nathan tyson experience (only got a taster at salisbury).
Then they're gonna go home disappointed.
The only other option is the kris commons experience...

[ForestFire]

No more chances for **** ups.

[libertine]

Hmmmm I can't see a **** up tonight from us to be honest.

As long as we go in with a decent enough attitude (which we should as its a replay) this game will be made infinatley easier by playing at our place.

I suspect a 3 - 4 goal win may happen, But we certainly cant afford to be complacent.

[Adyduck]

BATTERED TYSON SET TO HIT BACK



12:00 - 12 December 2006


Far from a relaxing break by the sea, the Forest striker headed back up north last week more than a little battered and bruised.

The League One leaders were embarrassed in a physical encounter with Salisbury in the FA Cup and were up-ended by Bournemouth two days later.

And, while the rest of the squad were left red-faced, Tyson was black and blue - after an early collision with Bournemouth goalkeeper Neil Moss left him with double vision.

For someone who lost his sight completely as a child, it was only a minor setback, as he proved with an outstanding hat-trick against Crewe on Saturday.

But he admits, after his experiences down on the South Coast, he's happy to be facing Salisbury in tonight's FA Cup replay on home soil.

"I was in the wars a bit down there," he said. "I had stitches on Sunday and lost my vision on Tuesday, so I had a lovely time.

"It was a bit scary. I felt embarrassed and gutted when I had to come off against Bournemouth. I felt like I'd let the side down.

"I've lost vision in both eyes before when I banged my head as a kid. That was worse because I lost it for eight hours.

"This time the double vision had gone by the end of the game, but you can't mess with that kind of thing.

"I could have headed the ball, or got another knock. You just don't mess about with things like that."

There will also be no messing about with Salisbury tonight after Forest made harder work than necessary of trying to dispose of the non-leaguers.

Tyson's goal in the original tie should have been enough to secure a third round tie at home to Charlton - but Matt Tubbs forced a replay with his second-half strike.

Tyson, however, insists Forest will let nothing get in the way of a lucrative third round tie that awaits the winner.

"We're not going to slip up," he said. "Conditions suited them last time, but when they come to our place conditions are going to suit us.

"We're going to take the game to them and show them what we can do.

"I hope they were at Crewe on Saturday watching that performance, because I thought it was fantastic.

"It was one of the best since I've been here."

Tyson, too, produced one of his finest games since arriving at the City Ground just over a year ago.

Scoring the perfect hat-trick - one with either foot and a header - it was the clearest indication yet that he is nearing full-fitness following his knee-ligament damage.

Not that he thinks that will secure his place in the team, given the striking options Colin Calderwood's disposal.

He has already seen how the Forest manager was prepared to let leading goal scorer Grant Holt leave for Bristol City. And after being left behind by the team bus on Saturday, Tyson is under no illusions that his place in the starting XI is guaranteed.

"The gaffer makes tactical changes," he said. "I might not be involved tonight or the following Saturday and you have to take what he says.

"It gets the best out of you because you are always looking over your shoulder and you know you always need to perform on the pitch.

"It creates rivalry, but the rivalry isn't bitter - it's just friendly competition and something you need to get on with."

Tyson has been particularly impressed with the way Holt has reacted to being told he could leave the City Ground - scoring a wonderful opener against Crewe.

"He's got a lot on so he's taken it really well," he said. "He's got his head down and worked hard and it's paid off for him. We've both enjoyed having a run out together recently. We had a go against Salisbury, but we only got 15 minutes at Bournemouth.

"Against Crewe we showed what we can do.

"Grant is the one I've played with most. We have a little bit more understanding because we've had more practice."

We may have to be patient for a while tonite but with our high tempo game we should kill off salisbury early on to grab a win and a 3rd round tie at home to charlton.And a home coming of andy reid.

[Adyduck]

WE CAN BEAT FOREST TONIGHT, SAYS GOAL HERO TUBBS



12:00 - 12 December 2006

Salisbury hero Matt Tubbs has warned Forest that the non-leaguers will be out to finish the job tonight.


The striker's well-taken equaliser in the first tie set up a dream replay for the minnows from the south coast.

And now he says they believe they can cause another upset and book their place in the third round against Premiership club Charlton.

Tubbs said: "There's no reason why we can't beat Forest at their place.

"We've more than matched them on our own patch and could even have nicked a win.

"It's absolutely unbelievable and difficult to put into words what this means to the club.

"Forest are a top-class side and it was fantastic playing in front of all those people in the first match," he added.

"My goal was one of the most important I've scored and I will always remember it."

I hope they do come over confident it will be our pleasure to put them back in their place :clap

[Manic Loop]

tubbs by name.... hope we shut the porker up.

but we have to be wary. he strikes me as a bit of a commons type player

[nffcsharp]

I just hope the players take this game very seriously. I don't want another upset, especially in the FA Cup. I want us to play Charlton in the next round and tbh I think we're in with a shout of beating them aswell. But lets just try and get past Salisbury first...

[smiggy]

I think Agogo is on the bench tonight so thats good, now all the strikers are fit its going to get very interesting, sorry Lester, your 6th choice and hopefully going in January.

[michael123]

I think Agogo is on the bench tonight so thats good, now all the strikers are fit its going to get very interesting, sorry Lester, your 6th choice and hopefully going in January.
hopefully hes 4th choice, hes way better then harris and dobie and offers something no other striker has. and his vision is superior to any other strikers as well. deffo good for the bench.

[smiggy]

well hes not been on the bench recently so looks like it

[ForestFire]

Strong line up despite 3 changes.:clap

[ForestFire]

Captain Culip :D

[BKW182]

COME ON YOU REDS!!
Is one block in bridgeford seating their whole city?

[ForestFire]

Poor so far. Typical performance yet again. Need to turn this around. A HT CC bolocking should do the trick. :laugh unless we can turn this around before HT.

[BKW182]

i agree with the half time calderwood bollocking!
it seems to work a lot n the lads like attackin trent end in second half

[ForestFire]

Its been an improvement but still not at all impressed with the Forest team tonight. Very poor so far.

[smiggy]

We haven't been that bad, Salisbury have got men behind the ball well and not letting us create anything, a goal as quick as possible in 2nd half is a must then hopefully we'll go on from there, Commons looks very sharp and is playing the best I think he ever had for us at the moment, Tyson looks sharp aswell and Agogo has done ok after a few games out. Holt's movement is good but his finishing is dire, but that does not mean put Harris out ForestFire. Need to improve and if we do a little bit, we'll win the game, Salisbury will tiar and its up to us to inflict misery on them.

[libertine]

Hmmmm, I still think the shape of the team is wrong with 3 up front.

Cullips marshalled the defense well.

Perch has been pretty bad to be honest.

Agogo and Tyson are scaring them, Tysons had a few balls to get onto but not enough really - Tame finish when clean through mind.

Grant Holt is working hard and linking up pretty well but doesnt quite seem at the races.

Bennett is going to get himself sent off at this rate! How could he complain about that booking!!!

[king billy]

Come on Forest...

[BKW182]

i dont think harris is even on bench

pederson breckin southall dobie n lester i think it was...

[smiggy]

Well were missing southall so put him on for Perch, it hurts to say that but playing Perch in RM is totally wrong, or take off Gary Holt or Clingan and put Perch in the middle, keep faith with the front 3, they're looking dangerous and I can't see Dobie nor Lester improving it, they will worsen it. How do u feel bout Harris being out the first 16 now FF? He's not being rested because the last time he played was 15mins at Bournemouth

[ForestFire]

We haven't been that bad, Salisbury have got men behind the ball well and not letting us create anything, a goal as quick as possible in 2nd half is a must then hopefully we'll go on from there, Commons looks very sharp and is playing the best I think he ever had for us at the moment, Tyson looks sharp aswell and Agogo has done ok after a few games out. Holt's movement is good but his finishing is dire, but that does not mean put Harris out ForestFire. Need to improve and if we do a little bit, we'll win the game, Salisbury will tiar and its up to us to inflict misery on them.

Oh dear, someone can't let the Harris thing drop. Medication kicking in?

[ForestFire]

Hands off Bruce still! N1 Tyson. :D

[BKW182]

Get In My Son 1 - 0! Tyson Tyson Tyson!

[Adyduck]

Oh dear, someone can't let the Harris thing drop. Medication kicking in?

Thats the pot calling the kettle if i ever heard it.and yes harris didnt even make the bench,probably left in crewe aswell.

TYSSSSSONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN:clap now lets go kill the game off with another goal:clap

[ForestFire]

Thats the pot calling the kettle if i ever heard it.and yes harris didnt even make the bench,probably left in crewe aswell.


If he was left in Crewe it would have been stated.:rolleyes: I'm sure he is at home.

[Adyduck]

Anyone think the guy in front of nick holmes in the stand is the lookalike of elton john :laugh

[Adyduck]

I wish perch would fook off with his long range shooting he always skies them all.See the look on cc's face to him.

[Adyduck]

I dont like it how we are letting salisbury play and we are just sitting back.we should of been 2 up by now hope we grab a second b4 they make it count.

[BKW182]

wish i had sky
colin fray good commentator and all but sometimes i just cant picture it.

[Adyduck]

commons off dobie on

[Adyduck]

nicky southallllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllll 2-0 maybe off side but who gives a fook:laugh but just listening to tv it was onside game over bye salisbury enjoy the long trip home:handbags.tyson coming off lester on.TV jinx finally over:clap

[ForestFire]

What are you playing at Grant Holt. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

[Adyduck]

If u didnt notice he was involved in the build up to the 2nd goal with the pass throught to tyson who squared the ball for southall to score:clap .And he's just run from one side of the pitch to the other and is back tracking.tubbs snapped our corner flag.GIT

[Adyduck]

Grant holt just put it on a plate for lester and he blasts over and wide.:rolleyes:

OH WELL bring on the charlton :clap :clap :clap

Nathan Tyson man of the match by sky:clap

[ryan_forest]

What are you playing at Grant Holt. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:


Whats that? teeing up tyson for the first goal.

Overall professional but poor performance. Commons delivery from set pieces was terrible. Perch was very poor i thought and Bennett looked a bit dodgy.

I thought Clingan had another good game and Tyson looked lively although missed a few decent chances. Grant Holt was linking up play well although he also missed a few good chances.

[nffcsharp]

Not a bad match, but Salisbury came too close for comfort at times.

Tyson was great tonight. Foreever causing problems.

[smiggy]

good professional performance forest, went out to get the job done and thats exactly what we did. Give huge credit to Salisbury, they worked their socks off and gave us a very tough ride. We came through sticky patches and were very strong at the back, Cullip was brilliant in defence and needed to be. We did waste chances but we took two goals which is all that matters at the end of the day. Delighted for Tyson, on terrific form and he's even scaring us how good he looks, constant threat and deserves his 5 goals in 4 games. Pleased for Southall to score his first for a few weeks, well done Forest, people will criticise the performance but don't listen to them, u did well and can go into the Charlton match with your heads held high :D

[Adyduck]

The performance wasnt that importent but the win was massive.we knew salisbury were coming to give us a game and finally we lay them to rest and look forwards towards a lucrative tie against charlton and andy reids return.Our tv wobbles have been put to rest,now we must face a club in leyton orient struggling in the bottom 3 of league one and they also got knocked out of the cup tonite by torquay.So they should be feeling rock bottom and thinking we have to go play the league leaders on saturday in front of a big crowd.if we can polish of orient in style and other results go our way we could pull further away from 2nd place in the league.

[FoReSt]

Despite a below average performance the win was all we needed and we got it. Tyson was poor in front of goal, missed 2 sitters and only just managed to score the 1 on 1 but was our only real threat. Grant Holt, Agogo and Commons could've done much more to finish the game of earlier but im not bothered, we won and thats all that matters.

I'm quite confident going into the Charlton game, they do play some neat football at times and look good going forward (in some games) but are sloppy in a lot of areas but i think they'll beat us, Darren Bent vs any of our defenders and we are in trouble. I think we will get a couple of goals though with there crap defence.

[redade]

at least we're through,thought clingan was man of the match,started a fair few moves off in midfield and some good passes made,thought gary holt was very poor in all areas,slow etc. cullip did well in defence though at times felt some of his clearances were rushed and could of distributed it better,though he got the movement going at abit of a faster rate when needed.tyson and commons seemed to run the show more than anyone with pace and trickery,though commons set pieces were poor tonight with two or three not beating the 1st man on the near post as did clingan.i felt perch was not as bad as what's previously been quoted,he did well playing out of position and managed two or three shots on goal and challenged for the ball well.
I thought the support from the fans was poor tonight and never really got behind the side except for a pocket full around the game,even with that bloke in the cloughie stand in block q who tried his hardest to get us in the trent end to start some songs which some did try to getting something going but to no real avail. i know the team really got us in the mood,but look at the salisbury fans they gave their all until the dying end. they were a credit to the side and good to see so many turn up and cheer on their side.salisbury deserved to get a standing ovation imo they fought and fought and never gave up. the fitness levels between the two never really showed over 90mins.
Does anyone else think gary holt is another one of cc's favourite sons and never seems to be dropped or subbed even if his game is dire,i think he is too old and slow to be playing week in and week out,i felt he should have took gary off tonight and put perchy back into the middle when he bought southall on.this three up front doesn't look right and doesn't seem to work as it means out and out strkers are being left out on the wings and leaving noone in the middle to attack the loose ball or the incoming ball as the midfield at times don't cover the attackers move out to the wings.

[smiggy]

I would give Cullip MOTM, had an excellent game in defence as he won everything, i thought perch did ok tracking back but was terrible on the ball. I thought Commons was superb in the first half but when he went up front we couldn't get him into the game. Tyson is a constant threat, scored one and made the other, lovely assist by Agogo for Tyson's goal which hasn't been commented, another assist for Agogo. I thought Holt was ok, he made good movement but his shooting was terrible. Other than that average effort from the rest and I thought Southall came on and did a good job, I only realised last night how big Southall is as a player for Forest after Perch's performance in RM, Southall is one of our key players and need to get him signed onto a new deal Forest :D

[PigFarmer]

Iwas impressed by Clingan and Cullip - thought cullip looked solid - but still tyson MOTM just becasue of the havoc he caused

[Roh]

No one else think James Perch was dire?

Not trying to get on his back as I rate him highly. I missed the first half as I was having to finish of a little job, so he may have been alright then, but he looked poor in the second half, whether it was nerves I'm not sure - Colin didn't seem too pleased with him either.

On to the game. We looked comfortable without ever really impressing. They didn't get a shot on target until added time, did they? No doubt the commentators and "experts" were wánking over anything half decent Salisbury did to make it seem like they were unlucky to lose.

Not taking anything away from them though, they never rested or let us dominate and for part-timers their fitness and vision was great, it's easy to see why they're doing well in Conference South and could go top after games in hand.

Well done to them, but we deserved the win.

[libertine]

No one else think James Perch was dire?

Not trying to get on his back as I rate him highly. I missed the first half as I was having to finish of a little job, so he may have been alright then, but he looked poor in the second half, whether it was nerves I'm not sure - Colin didn't seem too pleased with him either.

On to the game. We looked comfortable without ever really impressing. They didn't get a shot on target until added time, did they? No doubt the commentators and "experts" were wánking over anything half decent Salisbury did to make it seem like they were unlucky to lose.

Not taking anything away from them though, they never rested or let us dominate and for part-timers their fitness and vision was great, it's easy to see why they're doing well in Conference South and could go top after games in hand.

Well done to them, but we deserved the win.

Perch was TERRIBLE last night.

He gave away possesion pretty much everytime he touched the ball

[libertine]

Anyone else becoming increasingly frustrated with the formation.

People are playing out of position and the strikers are getting ine ach others way or having to function too far out wide.

Why on earth dont we go 4 - 4 - 2


................Smith..................
Perch....Cullip......Breckin...Bennett/Curtis
Southall...Holt...Clingan...Commons
..............Holt....Tyson...........


That way we have shape, Players playing pretty much in comfortable postions and Commons and Southall get the freedom to get forward.

Obviously a lot of you wont like Perch at RB (although I think its his best position) some will think Gary Holt should be dropped and Agogo should start ahead of Grant Holt but even then you can slot players in player for player in positions they are comfortable with.

[nffcsharp]

Anyone else becoming increasingly frustrated with the formation.

People are playing out of position and the strikers are getting ine ach others way or having to function too far out wide.

Why on earth dont we go 4 - 4 - 2


................Smith..................
Perch....Cullip......Breckin...Bennett/Curtis
Southall...Holt...Clingan...Commons
..............Holt....Tyson...........


That way we have shape, Players playing pretty much in comfortable postions and Commons and Southall get the freedom to get forward.

Obviously a lot of you wont like Perch at RB (although I think its his best position) some will think Gary Holt should be dropped and Agogo should start ahead of Grant Holt but even then you can slot players in player for player in positions they are comfortable with.
Tbh I don't really see a problem with the current formation. Its got us to the third round of the cup and top of the League so it can't be too bad. I'd sooner see Perch than Holt play though. I thought he was ****e last night, not that he was the only one.

[ryan_forest]

I dont think either Perch nor Gary Holt will be good enough for the championship, but at the moment out of the two id pick Gary Holt. Perch never seems to do anything during games and his shooting is woeful. At least Holt has experience and breaks up play.

Clingan has made a massive improvement in the last few weeks. Completely dominated midfield and very calm and selective with his passing.

[michael123]

your all being overlly harsh, and the sky commentators are **** :D we controlled the game, salisbury never looked like scoring, grant holts finishing wasnt great but it was highlighted too much, they were half chances and did you notice tyson missed two sitters and nothing was said about them? thats prejudgment for you because of the papers which sky kept relating to. there were only ever two people in the running for motm, even before a ball was kicked, it was either going to be tyson, if forest won, or tubbs, if they won. lester made a better impact coming on then dobie did and then harris ever will, granted he missed a very good opportunity but he started off the move with a lovely touch followed by a nicely weighted through ball and i think the lack of matches was the reason for his miss. dobie should have put him through one on one but he has a touch like an elephant. i think it was a good performance. tyson should have got a hatrick if he had scored his fairly simple chances, holt and a decent chance with a header which he should have done better with and we restricted them to one shot on target throughout the 90. we played some neat footbal and worked the ball, i cant see what everyones complaining at, we played as well as we needed to and should have ran out 4 or 5-0 winners without ever really excelling.

[bigwesmorgan]

Anyone else becoming increasingly frustrated with the formation.

People are playing out of position and the strikers are getting ine ach others way or having to function too far out wide.

Why on earth dont we go 4 - 4 - 2


................Smith..................
Perch....Cullip......Breckin...Bennett/Curtis
Southall...Holt...Clingan...Commons
..............Holt....Tyson...........


That way we have shape, Players playing pretty much in comfortable postions and Commons and Southall get the freedom to get forward.

Obviously a lot of you wont like Perch at RB (although I think its his best position) some will think Gary Holt should be dropped and Agogo should start ahead of Grant Holt but even then you can slot players in player for player in positions they are comfortable with.

wes morgan should be in instead of breckin.
cullip is the leader even tho they make breckin captain. he hasnt had a good season and stating to give away alot of silly fouls because he is not good enough to handle most the players eh playes against. he does have his good games now and then tho.

easy win i thought...i wentand altho salisbury did play well i never felt worried about them scoring the first goal or getting one back but they did play well.

and perch was quiet bad but he played him right wing then left wing and there not his positions.

[Adyduck]

All that mattered is that we won and now face charlton in the next round.performances can get better but we wouldnt of got another stab at beating salisbury if we had lost last nite.Roll on 6th january when we play charlton & im hoping for a birthday win:dk :drinkbeer :clap

[smiggy]

if u want to change a winning formation for us then we won't be top come end of season, it works, y do ppl always have something to moan about

[bigwesmorgan]

if u want to change a winning formation for us then we won't be top come end of season, it works, y do ppl always have something to moan about

i aint moaning about it just pointing out my opinion on it.

lets just say

if it aint broke dont try and fix it

[Roh]

if u want to change a winning formation for us then we won't be top come end of season, it works, y do ppl always have something to moan about
Where did you pull that out from?

We've used several formations this season. 4-4-2, 3-5-2, 3-4-3 and 4-3-3 from what I can gather, maybe more. All seem to have positives and negatives about them. Calderwood likes to keep opposition guessing and likes to adjust to try and expose any weaknesses him and his management/scouting team have noticed.

Personally I think, along with most English teams we're best suited to a basic 4-4-2 formation. Anything else and Southall has to be brought into the middle and we lose a great deal of creativity/crossing and an outlet wide right.

It's not so much moaning either. It's a forum, it would be rather tedious was to just agree with and accept everything Calderwood does.

[Manic Loop]

sky coverage annoyed me, makin out any salisbury schace or movement to be exemplary whereas ours which was better wasn't highlighted.

anyway, good win.. thought perch was out of position, not sure about bennett in a back 3, and our set piece delivery was crap.

[bigwesmorgan]

sky coverage annoyed me, makin out any salisbury schace or movement to be exemplary whereas ours which was better wasn't highlighted.

anyway, good win.. thought perch was out of position, not sure about bennett in a back 3, and our set piece delivery was crap.


if you go to the game then sky wouldnt of had to annoy you

[michael123]

if you go to the game then sky wouldnt of had to annoy you
and youd be 20 quid lighter in the old pockets...

[Manic Loop]

if you go to the game then sky wouldnt of had to annoy you
oh wow. i didnt go to the game.. let me be dictated to by some kid.. **** off laddy. im a season ticket holder. I can't make every game, I have other commitments and the club isnt my whole life. just a facet. so feck off.

[smiggy]

You are no more a fan if u watch every game compared to people who watch a dozen games or so a season, a lot of people can't make games, like to point that out, i hope everyone is going to charlton, i'll be shocked if it doesn't sell out

[bigwesmorgan]

You are no more a fan if u watch every game compared to people who watch a dozen games or so a season, a lot of people can't make games, like to point that out, i hope everyone is going to charlton, i'll be shocked if it doesn't sell out

he is moaning about the sky coverage so i said if it annoyed him so much he could of gone and wouldnt of had to see it. why dont you have a go at him for moaning about something pointless.

[bigwesmorgan]

and youd be 20 quid lighter in the old pockets...

incorrect actually was only £15 in the main stand and £10 in the other 2.

[michael123]

incorrect actually was only £15 in the main stand and £10 in the other 2.
yeah an i take it you can travel there for free, get drinks and food for free, and travel home for free?

[bigwesmorgan]

yeah an i take it you can travel there for free, get drinks and food for free, and travel home for free?

well i dont know why you always want to argue but.....
drive down only costs a few quid in petrol if you know where to park you can park there for free and nobody forces you to buy anything to eat or drink but you have paid for food at your house you would of ate instead so it just means you have that another night so its the same really.

[libertine]

he is moaning about the sky coverage so i said if it annoyed him so much he could of gone and wouldnt of had to see it. why dont you have a go at him for moaning about something pointless.

No its not pointless.

He had a VERY valid point - Even my housemates, none of whom are Forest supporters were getting very annoyed with the analysis. It was ridiculous.

He didn't know that the Sky coverage would be so bad did he? He could go INSTEAD of moaning as he didnt know he would have anything to moan about.

[bigwesmorgan]

No its not pointless.

He had a VERY valid point - Even my housemates, none of whom are Forest supporters were getting very annoyed with the analysis. It was ridiculous.

He didn't know that the Sky coverage would be so bad did he? He could go INSTEAD of moaning as he didnt know he would have anything to moan about.


so basically goin to the match would = no moaning.

watching sky = something to moan about

[michael123]

well i dont know why you always want to argue but.....
drive down only costs a few quid in petrol if you know where to park you can park there for free and nobody forces you to buy anything to eat or drink but you have paid for food at your house you would of ate instead so it just means you have that another night so its the same really.
sorry ill not get involved in debate on a forum designed for debates...

yeah a few quid petrol, food because i dont know about you, but i like to eat... and its more expensive eating out then in, a drink, maybe a pint, because for some people going to forest and not drinking is like going to the pub and not drinking, no one is forcing you to pay these granted, but no one is forcing you to go, especially when staying at home will certainly save you money! and its a fact i said it in a different thread (maybe earlier in this one) the commentators were ****

[bigwesmorgan]

if they was that bad then could u start a new thread and discuss it as i didnt watch it on sky so i came in ere to c what you all thought of the match...not the sky coverage.

[smiggy]

wot is ur sig all about bigwes, do u count wot games u go 2? Now thats sad

[bigwesmorgan]

wot is ur sig all about bigwes, do u count wot games u go 2? Now thats sad

well got bored the other night and i know the 1st game i went to so counted up i know plenty of people who do it thanks

[westyorksnfsc]

wot is ur sig all about bigwes, do u count wot games u go 2? Now thats sad

Personally I lost count about 15 years ago, can't see the point really!

[libertine]

so basically goin to the match would = no moaning.

watching sky = something to moan about

How did he know that there would be something to moan about if he watched sky??

Going to the match he may well have something to moan about - £15 to watch that absoloute dross.

Get over yourself and noone cares how many Forest games youve been to.

[bigwesmorgan]

How did he know that there would be something to moan about if he watched sky??

Going to the match he may well have something to moan about - £15 to watch that absoloute dross.

Get over yourself and noone cares how many Forest games youve been to.

no one asked for your opinion if you care how many i been to. just cause you can count yours on one hand.

how come you alwyas want to have an argument

[bigwesmorgan]

Personally I lost count about 15 years ago, can't see the point really!

just when you get bored and got nowt to do just wastes 10 mins

[libertine]

no one asked for your opinion if you care how many i been to. just cause you can count yours on one hand.

how come you alwyas want to have an argument

I dont.

There just happens to be a lot of mindless idiots on here.

And if you could count the number of games iv been to on one of your hands then I think that is a sign of genetic mutation due to generation after generation of inbreeding.

[bigwesmorgan]

I dont.

There just happens to be a lot of mindless idiots on here.

And if you could count the number of games iv been to on one of your hands then I think that is a sign of genetic mutation due to generation after generation of inbreeding.

wll your the mindless idiot who started on about my sig so your calling yourself really

[the sisco kid]

oh my god.....i cant actually believe what im reading....im sure ive mentioned this before, but if someone has a different view to you (not aimed at anyone just a general statement) dont berate them, this is a debate forum.

incidently the commentary was crap (sorry i couldnt make it please dont hammer me about it) they were absolutely desperate for an upset against the "twice european cup winners", the game was crap but at least we got the result and thats all that matters

[libertine]

I think you will find 2 posters did that before me.

But I think its more mindless to post the amount of games you have attended on a message board in a desperate attempt for people to take you more seriously or try and show your a 'real fan'. Especially when there is no way of verifying it. For all we know you could have been to none

[bigwesmorgan]

I think you will find 2 posters did that before me.

But I think its more mindless to post the amount of games you have attended on a message board in a desperate attempt for people to take you more seriously or try and show your a 'real fan'. Especially when there is no way of verifying it. For all we know you could have been to none

well i do half half of my old season tickets and all my away tickets near enough and if i dont have the match one have the coach if i went on it.

and putting how many games i have been to is just as bad as having "theres only one colin fray" and i dont listen to him but from what i have herd off people he is ment to b crap and boring.

plus i know people will have been to more games so im not trying to look good or anything i just put them there because i was bored and some people might be interested. didnt think it would have been such a big deal....arghhhhh